On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:28 PM, Gaurav Minocha
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Gaurav Minocha
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Rob Herring <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Gaurav Minocha
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> If there is no devicetree present, this patch adds the selftest
>>>> data as a live devicetree. It also removes the same after the
>>>> testcase execution is complete.
[...]
>>>> @@ -614,10 +616,31 @@ static int __init selftest_data_add(void)
>>>> "not running tests\n", __func__);
>>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>>> }
>>>> - of_fdt_unflatten_tree(selftest_data, &selftest_data_node);
>>>
>>> Can't you keep this factored out and just do "of_allnodes =
>>> selftest_data_node;"?
>>>
>> I tried to do that in first place, but of_alias_scan() called from
>> of_fdt_unflatten_tree(..)
>> needs of_allnodes. So, had to call it separately.
No, it is not or I'm missing some change. Or it is a bug? It is called
from unflatten_device_tree which is the early boot version.
> Actually, it's possible if rather than calling of_alias_scan from
> of_fdt_unflatten_tree, I write a wrapper and export it as below.
> So, I will be able to call of_fdt_alias_scan explicitly.
>
> of_fdt_alias_scan()
> {
> of_alias_scan(&kernel_tree_alloc);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_fdt_alias_scan)
I prefer to keep this internal to the DT code. Plus of_fdt_* functions
operate on a flat tree and of_alias_scan operates on unflattened tree.
>
> OR
>
> directly export of_alias_scan() and
> kernel_tree_alloc(u64 size, u64 align)
>
> please let me know if I should follow either of the above
> approach in my next patch.
Perhaps as you had it is fine.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
