On 8/19/14, 4:27, "Mika Westerberg" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:55:12AM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote: >> On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 09:53:58 +0300 >> Mika Westerberg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > From: Aaron Lu <[email protected]> >> > >> > Make use of device property API in this driver so that both OF based >> > system and ACPI based system can use this driver. >> > >> Do we always assume OF and ACPI _DSD will have the same property name >> strings? i.e. in this patch "gpios" >> > + if (device_property_get(dev, "gpios", NULL)) { >> > - if (!of_find_property(pp, "gpios", NULL)) { >> >> Maybe i missed something, but I don't think we can make that assumption >> in BIOS. If not, what is the point of having unified interface? > >We recommend that when it makes sense, the property names in _DSD follow >the corresponding DT names. > This is especially try for platform drivers such as this. We will be creating subsystem types, "gpios", and defining them in the _DSD Implementors Guide (per our discussion this morning at Kernel Summit). -- Darren Hart Open Source Technology Center [email protected] Intel Corporation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
