On Wednesday 03 September 2014 11:49:56 Mike Turquette wrote:
> > Right, makes sense. We have in the past done it either way for other
> > platforms. When merging the patches through the clk subsystem, it still
> > makes sense to let us know of those plans and ask for an Ack from
> > the arm-soc maintainers, to be sure we can plan ahead in case there
> > are other (conflicting) patch sets that are sent through arm-soc.
>
> Do I have your Ack for the arch/arm patches?
>
> [0]
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<[email protected]>
I have no objection to the change, but we might need to be careful in
case we get a lot of conflicts.
How about making it a shared branch that you plan to send upstream
but that we can also include in arm-soc to avoid conflicts if necessary?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
