On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 12:48:46AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 04:20:43AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Mika Westerberg <[email protected]>
> >
> > Allow the driver to probe from ACPI namespace.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c | 7 +++++++
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > Index: linux-pm/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c
> > +++ linux-pm/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c
> > @@ -181,6 +181,12 @@ static const struct of_device_id gpio_ke
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, gpio_keys_polled_of_match);
> >
> > +static const struct acpi_device_id gpio_keys_polled_acpi_match[] = {
> > + { "PRP0001" }, /* Device Tree shoehorned into ACPI */
> > + { },
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, gpio_keys_polled_acpi_match);
> > +
> > static int gpio_keys_polled_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > @@ -309,6 +315,7 @@ static struct platform_driver gpio_keys_
> > .name = DRV_NAME,
> > .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > .of_match_table = gpio_keys_polled_of_match,
> > + .acpi_match_table = gpio_keys_polled_acpi_match,
> o
> Hmm, why do we need the generic "PRP0001" in every driver? The ACPI device
> should have PRP0001 and ACPI bus should know to look into OF matching table
> for such devices.
Arnd had a good idea for this. How about,
.acpi_match_table = acpi_match_by_of_compatible,
where acpi_match_by_of_compatible is provided by ACPI core? Does that
work better for you?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
