Even thought sys_nirq1 is hardwired on the SoC for the pin, it is
better to configure the pin to the required mux configuration.

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm.dts |    9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm.dts
index 4107428..671e473 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm.dts
@@ -26,6 +26,12 @@
                        0x404 (PIN_INPUT | MUX_MODE0) /* i2c1_scl.i2c1_scl */
                >;
        };
+
+       tps65917_pins_default: tps65917_pins_default {
+               pinctrl-single,pins = <
+                       0x424 (PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE1) /* 
wakeup3.sys_nirq1 */
+               >;
+       };
 };
 
 &i2c1 {
@@ -38,6 +44,9 @@
                compatible = "ti,tps65917";
                reg = <0x58>;
 
+               pinctrl-names = "default";
+               pinctrl-0 = <&tps65917_pins_default>;
+
                interrupts = <GIC_SPI 2 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;  /* IRQ_SYS_1N */
                interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
                interrupt-controller;
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to