On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:53:58PM -0800, Kevin Cernekee wrote: >> From: Tushar Behera <[email protected]> > > This email bounces, so I'm going to have to reject this patch. I can't > accept a patch from a "fake" person, let alone something that touches > core code like this. > > Sorry, I can't accept anything in this series then.
Oops, guess I probably should have updated his address after the V1 emails bounced... Before I send a new version, what do you think about the overall approach? Should we try to make serial8250 coexist with the other "ttyS / major 4 / minor 64" drivers (possibly at the expense of compatibility) or is it better to start with a simpler, cleaner driver like serial/pxa? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
