Le 05/12/2014 16:00, Alexander Stein a écrit : > On Friday 05 December 2014, 15:16:55 wrote Alexander Stein: >> That clock should be called ac97_clk. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <[email protected]> >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi >> index 7989756..5ed2810 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi >> @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ >> reg = <17>; >> }; >> >> - ac91_clk: ac97_clk { >> + ac97_clk: ac97_clk { >> #clock-cells = <0>; >> reg = <18>; >> }; >> > > Please ignore those 2 patches for now. I made a mistake during local rebase.
Well at least this one (1/2) is valid and applies on my new at91-3.20-dt. So I take it for now: tell me if you feel otherwise. Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]> Bye, > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in > the body of a message to [email protected] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- Nicolas Ferre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
