In example 2 of the generic PM domains DT bindings, the unit address of
the device node representing the child power controller doesn't match
its "reg" property. Correct it.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt 
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
index 0f8ed3710c66e9e2..025b5e7df61c630c 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ Example 2:
                #power-domain-cells = <1>;
        };
 
-       child: power-controller@12340000 {
+       child: power-controller@12341000 {
                compatible = "foo,power-controller";
                reg = <0x12341000 0x1000>;
                power-domains = <&parent 0>;
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to