On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 08:39:35AM +0100, keita kobayashi wrote:
[...]
> > It is related, but Mark's remark is correct. We have to keep in mind
> > that an enable-method defines how a CPU is powered {up/down} and
> > also suspended (quiesced through idle).
> >
> > It has to be defined through proper bindings and related code, adding a
> > random compatible string for the sake of matching does not cut it,
> > that is not acceptable and I stated it from the beginning.
> >
> > So, to make it clear, an enable-method defines CPU operations as a
> > whole, cpu init, power{up/down} and suspend.
> >
> > It must be documented with proper bindings that defines compatible string
> > and
> > related properties.
> >
> > The sooner we incorporate the CPUidle ops into SMP ops the better to
> > prevent this abuse from happening, an enable-method encompasses SMP
> > ops and CPUidle ops, actually they must be merged because they represent
> > the enable-method implementation as a whole.
> >
> > I hope this helps.
> >
> > Lorenzo
>
>
> I will rename "renesas,rcar-idle" in the next patch.
It is not just about renaming a compatible string, it is about defining
a DT binding and related enable-method as a whole.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
