On 08/07/15 17:44, Andreas Dannenberg wrote:
> On 07/05/2015 09:08 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> <snip>
>> Looking pretty good to me, though I'd like to give Peter time to take
>> another look and give his reviewed-by etc.
>>
>> One really minor suggestion from me...
>> <snip>
>>> +
>>> +static int opt3001_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>>> +           const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>>> +{
>>> +   struct device *dev = &client->dev;
>>> +
>>> +   struct iio_dev *iio;
>>> +   struct opt3001 *opt;
>>> +   int irq = client->irq;
>>> +   int ret = -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> +   iio = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*opt));
>>> +   if (!iio)
>> return -ENOMEM; would be cleaner, then there is no need to initialize
>> ret either.
> 
> Hi Jonathan,
> thanks for looking at my code. While we are waiting for additional feedback 
> would you
> like me to go ahead and re-spin/re-test the patch with your latest suggestion?
> 
> Regards,
> 
Not to worry, I made that trivial change when applying.
There was also some fuzz in the makefiles and kconfig as
a result of other drivers going in, but all trivial.

Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git.

Thanks,

Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to