On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:43:25 +0200
Alexander Couzens <[email protected]> wrote:
> The ar7240 misc irq chip use ack handler instead of ack_mask handler.
> All new ath79 SoCs use the ar7240 misc irq chip
except the ar913x family according to the later documentation.
[...]
> --- a/arch/mips/ath79/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/ath79/irq.c
> @@ -315,8 +315,17 @@ static int __init ar7100_misc_intc_of_init(
> return ath79_misc_intc_of_init(node, parent);
> }
>
> +static int __init ar7240_misc_intc_of_init(
> + struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
> +{
> + ath79_misc_irq_chip.irq_ack = ar724x_misc_irq_ack;
> + return ath79_misc_intc_of_init(node, parent);
> +}
> +
> IRQCHIP_DECLARE(ar7100_misc_intc, "qca,ar7100-misc-intc",
> ar7100_misc_intc_of_init);
> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(ar7240_misc_intc, "qca,ar7240-misc-intc",
> + ar7240_misc_intc_of_init);
It would be better to keep the same formatting as the surrounding code.
Could you keep the IRQCHIP_DECLARE() together with the init function
and remove the extra blank line?
Alban
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
