Hello! > >> Any vendor prefix here? How generic is this? > > > > I just don't know... Does *everything* really need a vendor prefix? How > > readable would that > be? "compatible" property already says > > that it's samsung-exynos-specific. And IMHO it's quite obvious that > > properties of vendor- > specific device are automatically > > vendor-specific. > > Ok, i am currently fixing up the rest and will post v4 soon, and will Cc: > > it to devicetree > ML. > > Which my reply you are referring to? You stripped part of some > sentence and put it without *any context*. Just random sentence. > I asked for vendor prefix in few places... srom-timing? width? And I > do not remember where I used exactly these words.
Ok, sorry, i promise to improve. :) Anyway, i have figured out how to add sub-devices, and heavily modified the whole thing. And indeed, vendor prefix is now very useful, so i added it to all three properties. Making v4... Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
