Hi,
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 09:33:40PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 11 November 2015 at 19:00, Alexander Aring <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 03:34:45PM +0100, Alexander Aring wrote:
> >>
> >> What do you suggest to me for e.g. the raspberrypi power domain driver,
> >> also simple ignore such error handling?
> >>
> >
> > ping, I also can add some WARN_ON_ONCE, if the list for sub-domains,
> > etc. are not empty. This would then report about wrong use of
> > pm_genpd_uninit.
> >
> > - Alex
>
> Sorry for the delay.
>
> I think what you suggest would be an okay solution, at least it will
> improve the current behaviour.
>
> We should verify for sub-domains, attached devices, and if the genpd
> has an of-provider. That's all I can think of right now, but there may
> be other things as well.
>
okay, I added now:
WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(genpd->master_links) ||
!list_empty(genpd->slave_links) ||
!list_empty(genpd->dev_list));
So far I understand is master/slave something about domains/subdomains,
the dev_list fis for atteched devices.
But how can I check "if the genpd has an of-provider", the "struct
generic_pm_domain" doesn't know a "of-provider". There is a static list
"of_genpd_providers", do you want to iterate over all and then doing
some matching algorithmn? Or do you want to add something inside "struct
generic_pm_domain", so a genpd knows about the "of-provider".
I am currently confused about how to check on "of-provider".
- Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
