myPHPNuke is much more stable than any of the others, more secure and more
integrated. We include just about everything in our distribution and just
give you the opportunity to turn it off or on. Makes for a bigger file, but
it all goes in with one easy step. :-)

Garret
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:01 PM
Subject: Fwd: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: myphpnuke for e-smith


> Why myphpnuke instead of postnuke (personally use) or phpnuke?
>
>
>
>
> ----- Forwarded message from little bark BIG BYTE2
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 14:46:46 -0600
> From: little bark BIG BYTE2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: little bark BIG BYTE2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: myphpnuke for e-smith
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],"Smith, Jeffery S (Scott)"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Wow,
> I hadn't expected that. I guess you and I should talk further Darrell.
What
> I had invisioned Darrell was some sort of management interface that would
> allow people to create any number of mpn websites, along with the abilitiy
> to create virtual domains of course. That's one reason the ibays work so
> well. I've got e-smith servers that are hosting 20 or so websites, without
> ANY mods to the server. I would be very interested in speaking with you
> about this.
> As to which version...we are getting through much of the mud we've been
> going through lately, and 1.8.8 final should be available shortly.
> Looking forward to hearing from you on this.
>
> Garret
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Darrell May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "little bark BIG BYTE2" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Smith, Jeffery S
(Scott)"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: myphpnuke for e-smith
>
>
> >
> > little bark BIG BYTE2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > > Maybe we could talk e-smith into including us with their next
> > version....
> >
> > Do you have time to build the rpm or should I?  If I build it would you
> > recommend I use 1.8.7?  Last question, would you recommend I keep the
> > default alias http://yourdomain.com/mpn?
> >
> > --
> > Darrell May
> > DMC NETSOURCED.COM
> > http://netsourced.com
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
> > Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Archives by mail and
> http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
> Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives by mail and
http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
>
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
>
> --
> Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
> Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives by mail and
http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
>
>


--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org

Reply via email to