On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, John Powell wrote:
> Actually, from what I understand the current Mitel implementation > already violates the schema (note: I am not an LDAP expert) as they > have only defined entries as "person" and the current fields require > "organizationalPerson" and "inetOrgPerson" to be assigned for each > user entry. Not sure if this breaks anything though (and > schema-checking is disabled). If you try enabling schema checking you'll see why it is disabled. The LDAP schema has not been changed during the life of the product, yet there has been no demand from our customers for us to change it. I would really like to update the LDAP schema, and make more extensive use of LDAP. I'm pretty sure that we will do that for the next major release (IOW, not for 5.1). Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lead Product Developer Network Server Solutions Group http://www.e-smith.com/ Mitel Networks Corporation http://www.mitel.com/ Phone: +1 (613) 368 4376 or 564 8000 Fax: +1 (613) 564 7739 -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
