I was also concerned after reading this article. I've been running 2.4.x since February of last year and currently on 2 servers and 2 desktops at 2.4.10 and I've never seen any kinds of problems as outlined in the article.
But, of course, I am not stressing the memory on any of my machines. I keep the CPUs busy with compiles and seti, but rarely use more than half my swap. Hopefully, things have settled down a little now, because the USB support in 2.4 is so wonderful. Just my 2 centavos. Keith --- Kevin Tollison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just came across an interesting article on the 2.4 kernel. > The subject > hasn't come up lately, but I now see Mitel's reasoning for > staying with 2.2 > more clearly. Just thought it would be of interest to the > group. It can be > found at > http://www.linuxworld.com/site-stories/2002/0114.kernel.html > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.314 / Virus Database: 175 - Release Date: > 1/11/2002 > > > > -- > Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security > issues > Support for registered customers and partners to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archives by mail and > http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org > ===== LPIC-2 N+ MCSE The difference between Linux and Microsoft is the difference between trust and anti-trust. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
