> > Mitel could start a new survey on e.smith.org website to see what > >features are really needed / wanted. > > I think Mitel has made it very clear that the MAIN reason that they are > not putting extensive development time into this is the lack of custom > masquerading modules for iptables. There has been a fairly extensive > thread on this issue whereby several examples where presented showing the > short coming is linux 2.4.x.
Yep. Filippo does have a point that the survey on e-smith.org is pretty tired, though. At some point (not any time soon, but maybe in the next few weeks) maybe I'll put another one up that asks about masquerading modules or something.... good idea. Regards, Dan -- Dan York, Product Line Manager, SME Server and ServiceLink Mitel Networks Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: +1-613-751-4401 Cell: +1-613-263-4312 Fax: +1-613-564-7739 150 Metcalfe Street, Suite 1500, Ottawa,ON K2P 1P1 Canada http://www.mitel.com/sme/ and http://www.e-smith.com/ -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
