> I guess this was what Mitel pretended with "blades" but as they keep behind > schedule somebody has come with a new way of doing things.
Is there some reason we don't just modify the current blade structure to also allow pointing to localhost and/or an alternative local blade server? Though the formal doc is not out, Charlie put out some notes on how to build them a while back. Basically a blob of RPMs with a manifest. They seem to work nicely. JP -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
