Not to disparage it in any way, but SME currently is a wrapper around 
RedHat 7.1. While it should in principle be possible to make it a 
wrapper around a different OS or Linux distribution, this would 
entail rewriting each and every e-smith module. The result would be 
not a port of SME to PPC, but an SME-like OS or distro that runs on 
PPC.
If anybody were to seriously contemplate a PPC port, their best 
starting point would probably be Yellow Dog Linux 2.1, being probably 
the closest to RedHat 7.1 as you'll find on Linux/PPC. But even then 
you'd probably be in for a lot of rewriting of the e-smith modules 
and I'm not sure how friendly YDL's installer is to customization. 
Heck, the installer may not even be open source.

Regards,
Robert

At 09:11 +0930 06-06-2002, Stewart Evans wrote:
>Has anyone looked at the layout of Dawin/Mac OSX, they already
>have perl and apache on the server version, Installing would be via
>apple packaging which looks at first glance to be resonable,
>the only big problem is they currently use "sendmail" .
>
>The against would be a different kernel ( BSD ) to the intel version.
>
>Regards
>Stewart Evans
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Robert van den Aker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <c>
>Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:37 PM
>Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] ANNOUNCE: SME 5.1.2 for Alpha
>
>
>>  Porting to PowerPC or Sparc would be considerably more difficult, I
>>  imagine. While SME doesn't depend too much on x86 (and where it does,
>>  can easily be modified), it _is_ very much RedHat-dependent. Porting
>>  to Alpha was relatively easy because I could start from the same base
>>  (RedHat 7.1), with binaries from the same sources as x86 RedHat. Of
>>  course I still had to beat some other sources into submission before
>>  they would behave on Alpha, but that's all in the game. Porting to
>>  Sparc would be tantamount to single-handedly reviving the RedHat
>>  Sparc port: I wouldn't recommend it. The situation on the PPC end of
>>  things may be slightly more hopeful, depending on how far Linux/PPC
>>  have strayed from the RedHat path since the Linux/PPC Developers
>>  Release, which was a direct port from RedHat 6.2. But I can imagine
>>  that there would be considerable hurdles on PPC as well, not least
>>  the installer to begin with.
>>  A propos the road leading to the Alpha port: "use the source". All
>>  the source RPMS that I manhandled for this port are included in the
>>  iso. Any changes I made were made through patches to the original
>>  sources, or otherwise clearly commented and traceable.
>>
>>  Regards,
>>  Robert
>>
>>  >Jan van Haarst wrote:
>>  >>
>>  >>  On 4 Jun 2002 at 21:08, Robert van den Aker wrote:
>>  >>
>>  >>  > An unofficial port of SME 5.1.2 to the Alpha (aka DEC Alpha, Compaq
>>  >>  > Alpha, AXP) architecture is available now in my contrib area (thanks
>>  >>  > to Mitel for hosting it!). Please refer to the following webpage for
>>  >>  > further details (also linked from the 'Contributed HOWTO' page):
>>  >>  > http://www.robert2.dds.nl/howtos/alpha-howto.html
>>  >>
>>  >>  That's great !
>>  >>
>>  >>  Would you be willing to share the road that lead to this ?
>>  >>  Any major pitfalls ?
>>  >>  How hard would it be for someone to port SME 5.1.2 to another
>>  >>  architecture (e.g. PowerPC)
>>  >>
>>  >Or perhaps a Sparc?
>>  >
>>  >--
>>  >Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  >Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
>>  >Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  >Archives by mail and
>http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
>>
>>
>>  --
>>
>>  --
>>  Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
>>  Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > Archives by mail and
>http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
>>
>
>
>--
>Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
>Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org


-- 

--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org

Reply via email to