On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 11:53:44AM -0500, Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> >
> > In other words, there are "compare to sender" rules and "compare to
> > recipient" rules, and the "*" recipient means that that rule is a
> > "compare to sender" rule even if "compare to recipient" rules come
> > before it in the file.
> 
> This actually makes sense if your goal is to reduce bandwidth as much as 
> possible. If this sender is not permitted to send to anyone, reject them 
> as soon as we know who they are, rather than waiting to find out who they 
> want to send mail to.

Yeah, I see why the feature exists, and it's useful -- but I'd still
have preferred a different directive for sender rules instead of
making "*" magical. (Having to use "*@*" there is a pretty icky
kludge. :-)

  -Rich

-- 
------------------------------ Rich Lafferty ---------------------------
 Systems Administrator/Support Engineer, Network Server Solutions Group
    Mitel Networks, Ottawa, ON                 +1 613 592 2122 (x2513)
-------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --------------------

--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org

Reply via email to