_Very_ impressive to Robert do this on his own!

APPLAUSE!

Regards,
Hsing-Foo

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Robert van den Aker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Verzonden: woensdag 20 november 2002 22:32
> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Onderwerp: [e-smith-devinfo] Coming soon: Unofficial SME 5.5 for Alpha
> 
> 
> Dear Alphaphiles,
> 
> I'm sure it's not as eagerly awaited as SME 5.6 for x86, and the 
> announcement is a bit premature, because some final testing remains 
> to be done, but I'd like to inform anyone interested in the 
> unofficial Alpha port of SME that I'm currently running what I 
> believe will be the as-official-as-it-gets unofficial SME 5.5 for 
> Alpha.
> I'll keep you posted on how the tests are going and when to 
> expect the iso.
> 
> In the meantime here are the release-notes, which will probably not 
> change between now and the actual release:
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> SME/Alpha Server and Gateway V5.5
> Release notes - November 18, 2002
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Below you'll find a few notes about the differences between 
> this unofficial and unsupported Alpha port and Mitel's 
> official, original release for intel-compatible systems, as 
> well as a brief summary of Alpha-specific changes.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Differences from the original i386 release
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> For a quick overview of differences between this release and 
> the original i386 release, have a look at the file 
> RedHat/base/comps on this CD-ROM. The comps file is the file 
> that tells the installer what software packages to install. 
> For this release I've kept the original comps file from the 
> i386 release intact, with the addition of flags where there's 
> a difference between i386 and alpha. These flags are 'i386:' 
> for any packages that only exist for or should only be 
> installed on intel-compatible systems; 'alpha:' for those 
> packages that are specific to this release; and '!alpha:' 
> (which means 'not on alpha') for packages that can be 
> installed on alpha systems, but were excluded from this 
> release for reasons that I'll explain below.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> First the 'i386' packages. I suppose it's fairly obvious why 
> they are i386-only.
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>      i386: e-smith-boot-image
>      i386: e-smith-lilo
>      i386: e-smith-reinstall-floppy
>      i386: kernel-pcmcia-cs
>      i386: lilo
>      i386: mkbootdisk
>      i386: syslinux
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Next are the alpha-only packages:
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>      alpha: @ SMEAlphaBase
>      alpha: @ SMEAlphaExtras
> 
> which expands to:
> 
>      SMEAlphaBase:
> 
>      aboot
>      curl
>      mgetty
>      obtuse-smtpd-qmail
>      e-smith-obtuse-smtpd
> 
>      SMEAlphaExtras:
> 
>      links
>      ncftp
>      apache-manual
>      maildrop-man
>      man-pages
>      python2-docs
> 
> The most surprising packages in this set are probably 
> obtuse-smtpd-qmail and e-smith-obtuse-smtpd. I had to revert 
> to using obtuse-smtpd because mailfront didn't function 
> properly on alpha: mailfront was accessible from the 
> localhost (tested with mconnect, pine, fetchmail and IMP), 
> but not from any host on the network. Connections with 
> tcpclient from network hosts to port 25 were allowed and 
> idented, but mailfront would not then take over. Because of 
> the return to obtuse-smtpd I put the (empty) template for 
> /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts, which had been moved to 
> e-smith-mailfront, back into e-smith-email. The original 
> e-smith-email package is included on this CD-ROM under 
> RedHat/test-packages, along with mailfront and 
> e-smith-mailfront packages, to allow you to help diagnose the problem.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Packages included in the i386 release but excluded from this
> release:
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>      !alpha: SMEServer
>      !alpha: apmd
>      !alpha: db31
>      !alpha: e-smith-blades
>      !alpha: e-smith-keys
>      !alpha: e-smith-mailfront
>      !alpha: e-smith-rpm
>      !alpha: mailfront
>      !alpha: megaide
>      !alpha: php-pgsql
> 
> * The exclusion of mailfront and e-smith-mailfront is
> explained above.
> * The packages SMEServer, e-smith-blades, e-smith-keys and 
> e-smith-rpm all have to do with the 'blades' update system 
> and I don't have a blade server.
> * apmd is the advanced power management daemon for laptops.
> An alpha binary does exist for this package, but the RH 7.0 
> installer that we use for SME/Alpha won't install it because 
> of "circular dependencies".
> * A binary for db31 does not exist for alpha. Apparently all 
> the required routines are in db3.
> * Megaide was excluded because it wouldn't compile and I
> can't test it anyway.
> * The RH 7.0 installer wouldn't install php-pgsql without 
> postgresql and it's not much use without postgresql anyway.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> SME/Alpha-specific changes
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> * The installation and upgrade floppies now give you a
> choice of installation methods. Available methods are
> CD-ROM, ftp, http, nfs, and harddisk.
> * The installation instructions now contain more detailed 
> instructions for SRM installations.
> * Diald-top has been updated to a version that actually
> works on alpha.
> * An update to mm-1.1.3-8 and a patch to e-smith-base seem
> to have solved the problems with password-protected ibays,
> but don't ask me why.
> * Netatalk has been updated to 1.5.3.1-4, compared to
> 1.5.2-2 in the original SME 5.5 for i386. This has
> necessitated a small patch to e-smith-netatalk. Take this
> into account if you should want to update e-smith-netatalk.
> * Xinetd has been updated to 2.3.9-0.72, compared to 2.3.3-1
> in the original SME 5.5 for i386. This has necessitated a
> minor patch to e-smith-base. Take this into account if you 
> should want to update e-smith-base.
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Robert
> 
> --
> Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security 
> issues Support for registered customers and partners to 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Searchable archive at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org



--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org

Reply via email to