On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 01:41:18PM -0500, Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Les Mikesell wrote: > > > A few years ago a decision to replace sendmail probably made sense > > but now, especially with the split between inbound and outbound > > queues, none of the old reasons apply. > > The last security update to sendmail was how long ago? Hmmm, Oct 2002 - > not very long, really.
Trying to avoid a MTA flame war here... Les - if you feel sendmail is a better choice, and you are prepared to put in the effort to perform the conversion, please go ahead. Similarly for Postfix or any other MTA. We (Mitel) don't currently feel that sendmail is better choice, so we are not planning to put in that effort, and at this stage would not be convinced to change from qmail. Gordon -- Gordon Rowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Director, Engineering Network Server Solutions Group http://www.e-smith.com/ Mitel Networks Corporation http://www.mitel.com/smallbusiness -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
