Hello,

   Having spent 13 years in retail sales, I must say I am surprised
   at Mitel allowing discussions that have anything to do with a
   disagreement between them and a member of those who wish to
   contribute even be whispered on this list.

   I am one of *those* who uses their product, loves it, praises it...
   but can apparently not provide the 'volume' required to resale.

   Yet, I find myself forming a slanted opinion of the administration
   when I see discussions made such as this perpetuated by those
   who release the product. I am unaware of any 'rift', yet sense much
   of what was mentioned by Hsing-Foo Wang, and I say to myself...
   HUH? when it comes up again.

   Whether Mitel realizes it or not, this negatively reflects on their
   product/company.

   BTW, Paul Miller, your dissertation on the faults of Darrell May
   was IMO WAY off-topic.  Why do 700 people need to hear all that?!
   And, why isn't someone from Mitel saying so?!  I don't know the
   guy, but whatever differences exist... has anyone here not seen the
   corrosive negative that goes along with 'GOSSIP'?
   
   Now, for heck sake can we get on with development?


--
Best regards,
 Craig Jensen                           mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


}}}All ouotgoing messages scanned and verified virus-free by Norton Antivirus
2003.{{{



--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org

Reply via email to