Hello, Having spent 13 years in retail sales, I must say I am surprised at Mitel allowing discussions that have anything to do with a disagreement between them and a member of those who wish to contribute even be whispered on this list.
I am one of *those* who uses their product, loves it, praises it... but can apparently not provide the 'volume' required to resale. Yet, I find myself forming a slanted opinion of the administration when I see discussions made such as this perpetuated by those who release the product. I am unaware of any 'rift', yet sense much of what was mentioned by Hsing-Foo Wang, and I say to myself... HUH? when it comes up again. Whether Mitel realizes it or not, this negatively reflects on their product/company. BTW, Paul Miller, your dissertation on the faults of Darrell May was IMO WAY off-topic. Why do 700 people need to hear all that?! And, why isn't someone from Mitel saying so?! I don't know the guy, but whatever differences exist... has anyone here not seen the corrosive negative that goes along with 'GOSSIP'? Now, for heck sake can we get on with development? -- Best regards, Craig Jensen mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] }}}All ouotgoing messages scanned and verified virus-free by Norton Antivirus 2003.{{{ -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org