On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:14:24AM +0200, Nick Warr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > Sounds interesting, I really just need a way to have a copy of every > outgoing mail sent archived for review. If Charlie's contrib does that, I'll > give it a look.
Yes, it will do that. Much cleaner than patching qmail, and freely distributable. > [...] > Still fails with the same %prep errors though, and the exact same code is > there in the .spec file. I see your entry mentioning the removal, but it > doesn't actually seem to have been removed. Or maybe I'm just dumb (another > completely valid conclusion). No, I was just wrong :-) We did remove it from %pre/%post/%postun, but did not remove it from %prep section, which was an oversight. Since our build servers run qmail and already have these users/groups, it's a no-op for us. > [...] > I did, the .spec file even mentions the removal, it just doesn't seem to > have been done. Can I comment it out without hosing the whole thing? Commenting out the entire %prep section should be fine. But, I'd still recommend using the updated smtpfront-qmail instead. > [...] > Or am I way off here, and this has nothing to do with the requirement for > the qmail UIDs and GIDs. This wouldn't be impossible, as I am in no way an > expert in these sort of matters. No, you're quite right. You should be able to comment out the lines between %prep and %setup, excluding those actual lines. Gordon -- Gordon Rowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gormand.com.au Gormand Pty Ltd PO Box 239 St Pauls NSW 2031 Australia /* What a pile of australian legislature. */ - Alan Cox -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
