> > As I mentioned, this is not a trivial exercise. In > particular Kolab is > > built on postfix and Cyrus, SME uses qmail and uw-imap (I think). I > > prefer using ldap as central database. There are however > limitation on > > the design that the kolab guys have implemented. There is > no directory > > replication implemented. Although we have hacked this > ourselves, it is > > very pretty. > Is there a negative missing in the last sentence?
Yip sorry.... I meant to say it isn't pretty. Actually it may not be pretty but it sure does work. Instead of true ldap directory synching, we use e-mail triggers to update the database. > > Will have a look at it now.... > > It looks like a web-based system? > There is an XMLRPC functionality set too. KDE 3.2 may support > it - still being > decided. What about Outlook support? > > Kolab is purely a collaborative engine, it requires a > distribution in > > order to function. Why not choose one of the best distributions > > around? > I'm not sure it is the best distro to support kolab I am not so sure. What kolab needs is stable secure platform. SME fits the profile. > > But it may require extensive hacking to make it all work. > I think you'd end up redoing kolab to make it work seamlessly. We have reources to help with this if needs be > Brad > - -- > http://lca2004.linux.org.au - I'm registered. Are you? > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE/1FoqGwwszQ/PZzgRAhRQAJ921zmjsCQPgYqIVDMxqIX9y8tlmACgp11/ > 2zfz+pQPDs6kvzgZsd98WSE= > =qSCp > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
