Richard Hughes wrote: > On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 18:46 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote: >> How about a totally dynamic latency, which grows as soon as network >> traffic per hour decreases and the other way round. > > I'm not sure. I just know we have to build the framework so that other > much clever people than me can build policy that Lets Them Do What They > Want (tm). > > The key is making the interface definition simple enough for people to > use without trawling through docs, and complete enough that it allows > them to express complex monitoring. >
Thanks a lot Richard. And from what i've seen so far in devkit-power it's exactly moving in the right direction. I've taken a look at the current API for latency support and the latest revision looks already great. I'll be going over it over the weekend in more detail, but David already did a great job on that with a lot more background info about dbus than i have. Regards, Phil -- Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470 Team Lead Core Services | Fax.: +49-711-96437-111 Red Hat GmbH | Email: Phil Knirsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hauptstaetterstr. 58 | Web: http://www.redhat.com/ D-70178 Stuttgart, Germany Motd: You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me. _______________________________________________ devkit-devel mailing list devkit-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/devkit-devel
