On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:02, Martin Pitt<[email protected]> wrote: > Hello again, > > Martin Pitt [2009-06-16 9:17 +0200]: >> * TODO: nicer names for .ini files > > Done now, they use the vendor name as prefix and the model name if > available. Files updated. > >> This is a pretty comprehensive example of a "normal" USB player: >> >> http://people.ubuntu.com/~pitti/tmp/hal-udev-music-players/media-players/781-7432_7433_7434_7435_74c0_74c1_74c2_74c3.ini > > This is now > > http://people.ubuntu.com/~pitti/tmp/hal-udev-music-players/media-players/sandisk-7432_7433_7434_7435_74c0_74c1_74c2_74c3.ini > > I also turned the "not implemented" warnings into real assertions, so > that the code blows up immediately when something in hal-info changes > in a weird way.
Sounds all fine. I guess: SUBSYSTEMS=="usb", GOTO="media_player_start" GOTO="media_player_end" LABEL="media_player_start" can just be: SUBSYSTEMS!="usb", GOTO="media_player_end" right? The .ini file names look pretty weird. :) Do we define that there can be a list of .ini files? Or is one enough. Thanks, Kay _______________________________________________ devkit-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/devkit-devel
