On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 14:44 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > Indeed, and other vendors hook into it, so it's probably bad form to > ignore it. I've committed functionality in > cad70317771fa6ce1f52af9d357165d47e971d7d to exercise this -- can you > please check and let me know it's okay. Thanks.
Thanks! It looks fine to me. -- mterry • Canonical
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devkit-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/devkit-devel
