On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Projects should have proper nouns to tell them apart from other > projects. Otherwise, why bother, and just call them "kernel", > "browser", and "instant-messenger". > > Martin > So thinking about this a bit more, the question that should be asked here is "what *is* this project"? What is or should be the expectaction, requirements, or architecture of the project formally known as DeviceKit-Disks (or 'Power', for that matter)? Defining that any of this should change from previous definitions (whether the previous or new is either weak or strong) demands that the project can accurately describe what it provide and why it should have the name that has been given (or any paths or namespace). rf _______________________________________________ devkit-devel mailing list devkit-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/devkit-devel
