On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Richard Hughes <hughsi...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/12/30 Joe Marcus Clarke <mar...@freebsd.org>: >> I was wondering if more work was going to be done to have the daemon >> code call back to the backend code to get things like hibernate and >> suspend commands, swap details, etc.? > I think that makes a lot of sense. > Maybe a backend specific object, with properties kernel_can_suspend, > kernel_can_hibernate, hibernate_has_swap_space, > hibernate_has_encrypted_swap and methods of suspend and hibernate.
Isn't exposing hibernate_has_swap_space etc. too tied to the implementation details for this (and possibly too low-level)? Linux alone had a lot of changes to the hibernation systems in the past years, I can easily imagine that one day one of the multiple kernels will just ask you to pass a path (similarly to C:\HIBERFIL.SYS) and do the rest. -- Patryk Zawadzki _______________________________________________ devkit-devel mailing list devkit-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/devkit-devel
