On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 11:50 +0000, Richard Hughes wrote: > 2010/1/14 Maxim Levitsky <maximlevit...@gmail.com>: > > Problem was that devicekit has too many hardcoded tables, one of which > > makes all non standard device be treated as 'system internal' > > in update_info_is_system_internal > > Folks, is devicekit alive? > > > > I think that nether devicekit nor gdu must have no hardcoded tables > > (both have...) but to rely on udev rules. > > I'm sure David would be interested in a patch to move the tables to > udev rules, where it makes sense of course. > > Richard.
I do that sooner or later. However I currently use ubuntu 9.10, which has devickit-disks. I need to figure out what packages to update (from source of course) to make everything work with udisks. I hope, I only need to update the libgdu. On the other hand, I welcome warmly the name change. I always though that DeviceKit doen't fit unix naming tradition (for example mixed case) udisk/upower are much better. (if the daemon is called udiskd it would be even better...) Meanwhile note that I did publish the code on LKML and linux-mtd Best regards, Maxim Levitsky _______________________________________________ devkit-devel mailing list devkit-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/devkit-devel
