On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:25:30 -0500, Mike Turquette <mturque...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I was glancing over the QoS aspects of upower, and the control knobs > all appear to be related to latency. > > What if I had a codec for, say, video playback and I know it needs X > MHz to run properly. How could upower help me to do this? I'll > assume I have some cpufreq governor running in the background, but I > don't want to rely on that to get the job done when I already know my > frequency requirements. > > I guess my real question is, will frequency-based QoS knobs ever make > their way into upower? I know the hot topics these days are > constraints (dma latency, cpu wake up latency, network throughput, > etc), but sometimes you just need the megahertz. > You seem to be assuming that the cpufreq governor somehow does an inferior job of keeping up with your computational requirements. If the ondemand governor (which should be used in pretty much all cases) isn't giving you the clockrate necessary to keep up with your workload, then that's a bug. Cpufreq is the correct solution here. While you might think you know your frequency requirements today, they will invariably change over time and between machines. UPower doesn't implement frequency-based QoS management because it's fundamentally the wrong approach. This is what cpufreq is for.
You might want to take a look at Matthew Garrett's excellent blog[1] on CPU power management. I think it will help dispel a bunch of misconceptions you have formed. - Ben [1] http://mjg59.livejournal.com/88608.html _______________________________________________ devkit-devel mailing list devkit-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/devkit-devel
