On 11 May 2010 15:56, Tobias Arrskog <top...@xboxmediacenter.com> wrote: > For 1) I'd say define "idle" as being the abscent of "active". So "ping" > every X seconds when the system is active.
That sounds like a _lot_ of extra traffic on the bus. > I do agree though that it would be possible to get false idle but I would > say that it would be far simpler in the end if samba could ping that its > active since as it is now the computer would shutdown if set so in gnome and > I don't move my mouse even if a friend streams from my samba share. If I suspend on user-idle then samba is no longer able to process requests from my friend. I think the inhibit API's we have in the session right now cope well from a complexity / bus traffic point of view and it's highly likely you want to hook into that for XBMC. Richard. _______________________________________________ devkit-devel mailing list devkit-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/devkit-devel