Hi PCMan, If you're already using GLib and writing new code then it's probably much easier just to switch whole-sale to GDBus (which is in GLib 2.26 or later) than to use dbus-glib. If you feel adventurous, you might even want to try gdbus-codegen(1), see [1], - it can help save a lot of typing!
Of course, if you really wanted to save some typing you'd just use libgdu (from gnome-disk-utility) since that is the GLib-level binding for udisks (dbus-glib + handwritten). David [1] : http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/gdbus-codegen-20100629/ actually one of the test cases for gdbus-codegen is the org.fd.UDisks.Device interface, see http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/gdbus-codegen-20100629/DeviceProxy.html FYI we haven't yet decided whether gdbus-codegen(1) will be in GLib 2.26; but that doesn't matter much, the disclaimers in the man page will keep applying for a while until we iron this tool out for good. _______________________________________________ devkit-devel mailing list devkit-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/devkit-devel