On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 12:16:01AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> they are a nice thing, as long as you don't trust them -- and IMO,
> freenet will never be really popular without them.
>
> would _you_ memorize a long base64-number a friend tells you?????
Sure, but if it's by email, or instant message, or MOO, or USENET, you can
easily just copy the URL. Even if it is printed, you could type it in,
although many people would consider this user hostile. The only reason we need
guessable keys is so you can guess them, or quickly point somebody at them IRL.
Especially with search engines that understand SSKs, such as freegle.
>
> Michael Rogers (Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 07:18:44PM +0100):
> > On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 02:29:56AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > > Also, remember that there is no such thing as getting rid of KSKs.
> >
> > Removing the existing code that handles KSKs, and leaving KSKs out of any
> > Freenet URI standards/documents, would be a good start.
--
The road to Tycho is paved with good intentions
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
