On 16 Apr 2001 19:50:26 -0400, Peter Todd wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 06:44:54PM -0500, Owen Williams wrote: > > Anyone want to tell me what the hell is going on here? > > We regularly get posts from clueless newbies saying we need permanent > files and also saying they've figured out a way to do them. They have > been consistantly wrong. > > We're just a little fed up with all that nonsense. So Steve here > posted a wonderfully coherent reply to that wonderfully coherent > message! (warning!!! sarcasm!!!) Sigh, and I was once such an idiot. (btw, permanance _would_ be kinda neat -- *ducks*) owen FreeSearch truly is the king of kings: http://www.sit.wisc.edu/~ogwilliams/FreeSearch/ _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
- [freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary. Brad Allen
- Re: [freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary. Steven Hazel
- Re: [freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary. Owen Williams
- Re: [freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary. Rob Cakebread
- Re: [freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary. Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary. Peter Todd
- Re: [freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary. Owen Williams
- Re: [freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary. Stefan Reich
- Re: [freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary. Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary. Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary. Peter Todd
- Re: [freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary. Owen Williams
- Re: [freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary. Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary. Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary. Peter Todd
- Re: [freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary. Owen Williams
- Re: [freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary. Peter Todd
