On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 08:49:57PM +0100, Dave Hooper wrote:
> > 2) How would you rate your code for platform-independence and portability,
> > especially to platforms like Windoze?
>
> I don't personally see what the big issue is with portability of C code to
> Windows... unless the Freenet-in-C node code does __exceptionally__ weird
> stuff won't it just compile fine with Cygwin?
>
> Anywho, how's Whiterose coming along? I'd personally prefer to run a node
> written as a Java-to-C++ port than a Java-to-C port.
Reiska is not a port of Fred. Sure, I'll have to convert some of the
makeKey class of functions so that they'd make sense in C (while giving
correct results), but that won't make it a port. More like a "compatible
implementation".
> Do we need all these versions? Perhaps one in 'C++' and (at a pinch) one in
> 'C'. Oi Reckon.
Hey, I like C :-)
--
Kalle A. Sandstro"m ksandstr &at& iki &dot& fi
http ohutsuoli 2*viilto www piste iki piste fi viilto mato ksandstr viilto
1ED7 C636: 7728 49D5 F784 D2DD D20F 63CF 655D F19E 1ED7 C636
PGP signature
