On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 01:09:12AM -0500, Brandon wrote:
>
> > IC> I actually think that we should eat our own dogfood, and
> > IC> replace the FreenetInsert and FreenetRequest with versions
> > IC> that use FCP.
> >
> > That could be done at the SimpleClient level, rather than with
> > FreenetInsert/Request.
>
> I'm working on an XML-RPC-based freenetmirror clone. I first attempted to
> modify freenetmirror and PutFiles but found that the references to Client
> were prevalent rather than contained and decided that it would be too
> messy to switch. If you'd like to move freenetmirror around so that all of
> the Client calls are in a single class then I would happily replace them
> with calls to the Streaming API.
Hmm.. have you considered making an XMLRPCClient implementation of
Freenet.client.ClientFactory ? Then java programs would have the choice
of 3 client modes all with the same API:
ClientFactory cf = new FNPClient(core, target);
ClientFactory cf = new FCPClient(target);
ClientFactory cf = new XMLRPCClient(???);
Users of SimplifiedClient, and in the future AutoClient, would also have
access to 3 backends with the same API.
--
# tavin cole
#
# "The process of scientific discovery is, in effect,
# a continual flight from wonder."
# - Albert Einstein
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
