On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 04:14:17PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 09:49:16AM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote:
> > Ok, I have a very crude Freenet.scripts.Setup committed to experimental
> > which pulls everything from the options registered with the
> > Freenet.Defaults class by Freenet.Core and Freenet.node.Node.
> >
> > It's a little less user friendly now .. none of the involved questions,
> > it just spits out the little comments and demands a value.
>
> Maybe we should add a comment string to the option classes. That way the
> node could autogenerate full usage screens and alike as well...
I did add a comment string (actually in Defaults, not directly in
Params.Option). This is what gets put in the generated config file,
and also printed to the user.
What I didn't bother with (yet) was the "question string"
-- not sure whether that belongs in Defaults or directly in
Freenet.scripts.Setup. Freenet.scripts.Setup will probably need to
implement a few custom methods to override the default behaviors,
it might as well keep track of its own questions too.
--
# tavin cole
#
# "The process of scientific discovery is, in effect,
# a continual flight from wonder."
# - Albert Einstein
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
