If we use chunks instead of control bytes, then we definitely want to still keep it as compact as possible, and that means binary. Don't switch to FNP chunking. > give a known-plaintext attack. Since the padding is disguarded it's > upto the client to decide what to pad with - but I'd suggest something > at least slightly random. Thats difficult. We want documents to collide, so they all must produce the same padding. And if they do, then an attacker knows what the padding will look like. Almost... What you can do is just hash the last n real bytes, drop that as padding, then hash that, drop as padding, etc until you're done. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
- [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, Storables, and ... Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, Storab... Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, Storab... Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, Storab... Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, St... Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, Storab... Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, St... Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, St... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, Storab... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, Storab... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, Storab... Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, St... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, Storab... Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, St... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, Storab... Scott Gregory Miller
