> > 2) Dave's implementation reads the entry "fserve" in FLaunch.ini which
> > starts the graphical Node invisibly and thus wastes RAM. The solution
> > will be to have an entry fserveCLI (or similar which is read instead).
> > This is feasible
>
> Ok, Makes sense. I'll have to have a play to see if I can still quit the
> non-GUI freenet node by sending it a WM_CLOSE message. I might check in
an
> update tonight, or, I might just go to bed.
Well, seems to work so I'll check in the updated freenet.c, freenet.exe and
flaunch.ini
> > 3) Daves freenet.exe will signal an error on startup when using the CLI
> > node (Freenet.node.Node) while the graphical node (node.gui.GUINode)
> > works fine. *He* will have to fix this, as he added some complicated
> > stuff (multiple threads etc...) to my simple implementation, making it
> > impossible to me to understand it fully ;-). Dave are you listening?
> > Otherwise, I'll have to downgrade your tool to a level I can handle :-)
Works fine here. *You* will have to tell me what error you are getting cos
I sure as hell ain't having any problems with "Freenet.node.Node" in
flaunch.ini instead of "freenet.node.gui.GUINode" ...
... Although to be fair I still do most of my testing using jview.exe ...
Dave
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
