On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 08:45:33AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 01:40:13AM -0500, Scott Gregory Miller wrote:
<>
> > Thats hardly a reason. If the metadata points to the CHK of the data
> > thats an equally strong binding.
> >
>
> No it's not. It's only an assertion by whomever inserted the metadata. For the
>binding
> to be equally as strong, the data would also have to refer back to the CHK of the
>metadata.
> Then the agreement between inserter of data and inserter of metadata would be proven.
Bullshit. I can copy your CHK and insert new metadata linking to that CHK,
but I can also copy all the data add new metadata and insert the whole
thing. Why does it matter for two fucking seconds what the inserter of the
data thought when ANYBODY can reinsert it?
The ONLY assertion you have is by the person whomever owns the key you
started out with requesting belongs to.
--
'DeCSS would be fine. Where is it?'
'Here,' Montag touched his head.
'Ah,' Granger smiled and nodded.
Oskar Sandberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
