On Monday 11 June 2001 13:12, Ian wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 11:49:14AM -0400, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > Back in april, I suggested adding support for "checked jumps" to fproxy.
>
> Yep, this is a good idea, although why nescessitate that the page author
> uses "CHECKED__JUMP" - why not just do it for all off-freenet hyperlinks
> automatically
Here are my reasons:
0) I thought that there was a consensus on this list that having fproxy
dynamically modify html was a Very Bad Thing (tm) for several reasons.
e.g. it pisses of content authors, there are unforseen security/anonimity
implications.
1) Writing a real-time HTML parser that could handle such transformations
in a robust, secure way is hard. Knowing that your implementation is correct
is even harder...
The approach taken by the patch is really simple ( = robust and debuggable)
even if it is not as elegant.
Should I check it in?
-- gj
--
Web page inside Freenet:
freenet:MSK@SSK@enI8YFo3gj8UVh-Au0HpKMftf6QQAgE/homepage//
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
