On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 12:54:37PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 07:15:52PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 07:57:58PM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote:
> > > Fproxy should just support https instead of http. Browsers are pretty
> > > good about warning you when a page tries to load something from a
> > > different server or over a non-https protocol.
> >
> > While the unnescessary encryption-decryption is irritating, I tend to
> > agree.
>
> We could at least wait until fproxy doesn't use an encrypted protocol to
> speak to the node.
>
> Having this happen locally:
>
> Encrypt-decrypt-encrypt-decrypt-encrypt-decrypt-encrypt-decrypt-encrypt-decrypt
> ssl ssl fnp fnp fnp fnp fnp fnp ssl ssl
> browser fproxy fproxy node node node node fproxy fproxy browser
Ok, that isn't quite true. There is actually ONE MORE decrypt or encrypt
for the actual data...
> seems a little silly (and people wonder why Freenet is slow...)
>
> --
> 'DeCSS would be fine. Where is it?'
> 'Here,' Montag touched his head.
> 'Ah,' Granger smiled and nodded.
>
> Oskar Sandberg
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devl mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
--
'DeCSS would be fine. Where is it?'
'Here,' Montag touched his head.
'Ah,' Granger smiled and nodded.
Oskar Sandberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
