On Thursday 05 July 2001 16:11, MB wrote:
> >>>>> "GJ" == Gianni Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> GJ> OK. This was admittedly unclear.
>
> GJ> The issue is that successive requests get routed to the same
> GJ> (transiently unavailable) node in quick succession, causing
> GJ> all refs to get blown out of the DataStore.
>
> So, N failed requests will blow out N references, is that right?
N failed references that resolve to the same physical address will entirely
wipe that node (physical address) out of future routing.
>
> It seems like, with requests that go to the next closest node and
> SUCCEED, you'll get a new ref in your data store with a net change of
> 0 references (albeit with a changed routing pattern, now).
>
???
The issue isn't the number of references. It's the number of different node
addresses. What you will most likely get is another reference to a node that
you already know about.
--gj
--
Web page inside Freenet:
freenet:MSK@SSK@enI8YFo3gj8UVh-Au0HpKMftf6QQAgE/homepage//
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
