Volker Stolz: > In local.freenet, you wrote: > > It occurred to me that there might be some benefit to inserting freesites as > > a single redundant splitfile containing an archive of the site. (Or two > > archives - one for the static portion and one for today's insert). > > Can you think up a reason why this isn't done with current webservers? > And do these reasons still hold for Freenet? (You want to retrieve them > monolithically, too, even though you only mention inserting above, right?)
But web servers are reliable and fast. Freenet's unreliable and slow. You can kill two birds with one stone by tarballing websites into redundant splitfiles, but it'll be a nuisance when the tarballs start growing uncomfortably large. I think it's a net gain when used tastefully, and it has the pleasant side-effect of enforcing compression. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
