On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 05:50:20PM +0000, Timm Murray wrote: > Would that even be possible? Freenet basicly can't work at all without CHKs, and CHK >uses cryptographic hashes. Perhaps hashes wouldn't count? Hashes probably wont count, nor would digital signatures.
> > > Or we take a hint from Linux and separate the crypto from the main > > distribution and let those that can provide encryption do so. > > > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 11:10:00PM -0500, thelema wrote: > > > On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Jamie Morken wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > How is freenet going to work when encryption is outlawed worldwide? I am in > > > > Canada and they may be passing laws soon to outlaw true encryption for > > > > civilian use. This may be the case in European countries and in the USA as > > > > well! I think it will be hard even for Oscar to make a robust freenet > > > > without encryption! > > > > > > > > best regards, > > > > Jamie > > > > > > > Chafing and Winnowing comes to mind. steganography without encryption. > > > > > > Thelema > > > -- > > > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you love something, set it free. > > > GPG 1536g/B9C5D1F7 fpr:075A A3F7 F70B 1397 345D A67E 70AA 820B A806 F95D > > > > > > > > -- > > melt grits gerry cool > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------- > Runbox Mail Manager - www.runbox.com > Online email application > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl -- metric sly logger rot
msg02771/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
