[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 16.10.01: > I think there's no objection about merging these 2 programs. But, just a question, >do you really need to use MFC because I can't compile it with gcc :( (or maybe I'm >stupid).
I had the same objections before, but NodeConfig uses the MFC quite heavily, if you convert it to a "normal WinAPI" app, feel free, I can't. But they might still be compiled as to seperate projects (one MFC one not) and just linked together as one binary. I have to admitt that I don't really know if that is feasable on Windows or how to do it. > I noticed that you used a localized dll for the german version. Maybe it should be >better if all translations are included in the .rc file since windows autodetects the >language. Does it use the language specific ressources during compile time, or during run time? If it's the former that wouldn't be sufficient (we would need to provide a full compiled binary for every language) if it's the latter it might be nice to stick at least the main languages in there. I like the dynamic dll thing, because you can simply plug any language in there at any time. Sebastian _______________________________________________________________________ 1.000.000 DM gewinnen - kostenlos tippen - http://millionenklick.web.de [EMAIL PROTECTED], 8MB Speicher, Verschluesselung - http://freemail.web.de _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
