On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 09:30:20PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > My concern over doing that is that I'm not sure we want to assign new > > designators when we aren't changing the protocol; also it would cause > > disruption for the watchme nodes; as they would loose conductivity over the > > switchover > > The Watchme stuff is full of hacks anyways, and I'm assuming part of the > point of having a seperate test network is that people there are willing > to upgrade.
Agreed, the Watchme code is not intended to be pretty, it is just intended to work - and not screw up the non-watchme network. In-time we will probably strip out the Watchme code once it has served its purpose. I wouldn't lose any sleep over kludges in the Watchme code (since the whole idea is basically a kludge anyway). Ian. -- Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Founder & Coordinator, The Freenet Project http://freenetproject.org/ Chief Technology Officer, Uprizer Inc. http://www.uprizer.com/ Personal Homepage http://locut.us/
msg03142/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
