> > BTW, was there a specific reason that the patch I sent at the end of last > > week to path.pl wasn't accepted? I don't mind criticism, but when patches > > kind of fall off into the void, I have to wonder... > > > > -- David > > > I have applied your patch to my local copy of the code, but will > likely be taking the good parts of the code after that patch, the > current watchme.pl code and the other script that creates graphviz > graphs and combining them into one mega-script, once I've got a decent > form for organizing request data so that it's easier to manage.
I didn't mention in my last email - the graphing CGI that's out on hawk seems to be broken. The breakage seemed to coincide with when Ian added HTL as another data point in the logs, so a random stab says that's the problem. (Is the source code to that CGI avaialble? I'd guess it's primarily path.pl...) For evidence of this breakage, check some of the graphs it's generated recently: http://hawk.freenetproject.org/~watchme/cache/e76f86ec9e63f790.png http://hawk.freenetproject.org/~watchme/cache/eee3f20d92575591.png http://hawk.freenetproject.org/~watchme/cache/f4a4652028cf3b60.png There are a whole lot of very poorly connected singleton nodes with labels that sure look like HTL values. -- David _______________________________________________ devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
